I agree with your statement about anarchy. Chaos isn't good.Maybe we should all learn the very basics of anarchism first before discussing about it.
OK @Kim Jong Double Fuck enlighten us ...Start with wikipedia.
@V.O. Diedlaff I agree with your statement about anarchy. Chaos isn’t good.anarchism isn't the opposite of chaos. what you mean is agony. anarchism is order through arrangment between people.
In my primitive mind, an anarchist is a guy in a dark trench coat throwing a Molotov cocktail.Everything you write sounds like you still didn't bother looking up what Anarchism even means. Please do.
Of course words mean different things to different people and depending upon the context in which the word is used. In my primitive mind, an anarchist is a guy in a dark trench coat throwing a Molotov cocktail.no, no trenchcoat, no cocktail. only cubra libre (joke ) you have definitly a wrong image in your head.
The Wiki definition treats anarchy differently than another I saw. It treats anarchy as an ideal, whereas in my mind it’s an absence of ideals.the word anarchy is more a philosophy word. an anarchism is a lived form that should come as close as possible to anarchy. there are some example that was reality in the past. for example the spanish civil war (1936-39) or the machnowitschina movement (a part of the ukraine 1918-21) and so on.
But that’s neither here nor there, what I’m against is chaos.i am an anarchist and i am totally against chaos, too. sometimes i feel that i use more order than my "normal" friends.
I don’t believe in an Ayn Rand world of self-interested individuals, or that an unregulated market will always be guided by an invisible hand causing it to do the right thing. Some things need to be limited; murder, for instance needs to be punished lest it become an acceptable practice. Markets need to be regulated lest they result in bursting bubbles that threaten to take down world economies.wait, are you talking about the present? then maybe you're right about one thing or another. but humans can handle cooperation better than competition. and now human is born as a murder or something like that.
I did and I stand by what I wrote. It’s one of those words that takes on multiple meanings.yes, but than you are definitly wrong. in all ways.
I think perhaps under ideal conditions society could function without a hierarchical structure, but I don’t see how it could function without regulations.the regulations, rules or whatever give the humans to eachother on eye-level. and when you don't have an interest in making money you have to regulate something.
you have to regulate something.you don't have to regulate something. meidiot