One conservation group warns that the move shows "a troubling disregard for international rule".
Article word count: 881
HN Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18769508
Posted by kn8
(karma: 264)Post stats: Points: 145 - Comments: 140 - 2018-12-27T14:10:12Z
a minke whale in the Ross Sea in Antarctica Image copyright AFP/Getty Images Image caption Japan will be free to hunt whales like the minke for commercial purposes from July onwards
Japan says it is to restart commercial whaling in July in a move that is likely to draw international criticism.
It said it would withdraw from the International Whaling Commission (IWC), the body tasked with whale conservation.
Commercial whaling was banned by the IWC in 1986 after some species were driven almost to extinction.
Officials in Japan, an IWC member since 1951, say eating whales is part of the countryʼs culture.
For many years Japan has hunted whales for what it calls "scientific research" and to sell the meat, a programme widely criticised by conservationists.
Wednesdayʼs announcement had been expected, but conservation groups warn the move will have serious consequences.
It means Japan will be able to freely hunt species currently protected by the IWC, like minke whales.
What did Japan just announce?
Government spokesman Yoshihide Suga said commercial whaling would be restricted to Japanese territorial waters and economic zones.
As a result, Japan will stop hunting in Antarctic waters and the southern hemisphere, a prospect conservation groups had welcomed before it was formally confirmed.
A statement by Japanʼs government said the IWC was not committed enough to one of its goals, of supporting sustainable commercial whaling.
It accused the IWC of being focused only on the aim of conserving numbers.
Image copyright AFP/Getty Images
Image caption Sushi made of whale meat and blubber sold in Miyagi prefecture
A number of coastal communities in Japan have hunted whales for centuries, but consumption in the country surged only after World War Two when whales were the main source of meat. It has plummeted in recent decades.
According to Japanʼs Asahi newspaper, whale meat makes up only 0.1% of all meat sold in Japan.
Whatʼs been the reaction?
In a joint statement, Australiaʼs Foreign Minister Marise Payne and Environment Minister Melissa Price said they were "extremely disappointed" with Japanʼs decision.
"Australia remains resolutely opposed to all forms of commercial and so-called ʼscientificʼ whaling," the statement added.
Before the formal announcement was made, Nicola Beynon, head of campaigns at Humane Society International in Australia, said Japan would be "operating completely outside the bounds of international law".
She added: "This is the path of a pirate whaling nation, with a troubling disregard for international rule."
Greenpeace Japan urged the government to reconsider, and warned it would risk criticism as the host of the G20 summit in June.
Sam Annesley, Greenpeace Japanʼs executive director, said: "Itʼs clear that the government is trying to sneak in this announcement at the end of year, away from the spotlight of international media, but the world sees this for what it is.
"The declaration today is out of step with the international community, let alone the protection needed to safeguard the future of our oceans and these majestic creatures."
What is the current whaling ban?
In 1986, IWC members agreed to a moratorium on hunting to allow stocks to recover.
Pro-whaling nations expected the moratorium to be temporary, until consensus could be reached on sustainable catch quotas.
Image caption Currently, Japan kills whales under a so-called scientific research programme
Instead, it became a quasi-permanent ban. Whaling nations, such as Japan, Norway and Iceland, however argue the practice is part of their culture and should continue in a sustainable way.
Today, whale stocks are carefully monitored, and while many species are still endangered, others - like the minke whale that Japan primarily hunts - are not.
In September, Tokyo tried to get the IWC to allow commercial catch quotas but the proposal was rejected.
Can Japan just leave?
It will still be bound by certain international laws, despite leaving the IWC.
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea binds countries to co-operate on the conservation of whales "through the appropriate international organisations for their conservation, management and study". The text does not say which international organisation that is.
Japan could either try to set up another international body if it manages to get enough other countries to sign up - or join an existing one like the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (Nammco) instead.
Like a smaller version of the IWC, Nammco is a grouping of pro-whaling nations - Norway, Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands - born out of frustration with the IWC.
Hasnʼt Japan been whaling all along?
Yes, Japan has been hunting whales for the past 30 years but under a scientific programme, granted as an exception under the IWC ban.
Critics say the practice is a cover for what actually amounts to commercial whaling.
Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption Japan takes hundreds of whales each year
It means that whales can be taken for scientific studies and the meat can later be sold for consumption.
Japan has caught between about 200 and 1,200 whales each year, saying it is investigating stock levels to see whether the whales are endangered or not.
Why canʼt the IWC agree?
Japan has repeatedly tried to overturn the moratorium and secure agreement on sustainable catch quotas.
The last attempt to do so came in September at an IWC summit in Brazil.
Japan offered a package of measures, including setting up a Sustainable Whaling Committee and sustainable catch limits "for abundant whale stocks/species".
The proposal was voted down. Since then there has been talk of the country simply leaving the body so it will no longer be bound by its rules.
HackerNewsBot debug: Calculated post rank: 143 - Loop: 121 - Rank min: 100 - Author rank: 80
One conservation group warns that the move shows "a troubling disregard for international rule".www.bbc.co.uk